| Site | Format | Passage / topic | Score | Severity | Reviewer's note |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /fr | Daily devotional | 1 Samuel 18:4 | 8/10 | minor | The quotation is verbatim and the reflection is warm and well-crafted, but it presents interpretive inferences as fact: that Jonathan knew David was God's chosen replacement and consciously knew what he was losing (the text says neither at 18:4), and that he had already 'heard the people sing his name', which occurs later in the narrative (18:6-7). The assumption that the reader has just spent a S |
| /en | Daily devotional | John 5:6 | 7/10 | major ✓ corrected by QC · re-check 9/10 |
The Scripture quotation is verbatim and the reading of the man's evasive answer (v.7) is faithful to the text, but the claim that thirty-eight years is "longer than Israel spent in the wilderness between Kadesh and the brook Zered" is factually wrong: Deuteronomy 2:14 gives exactly thirty-eight years, so the span is equal, not longer. The crowd detail "dozens of them" also goes slightly beyond Joh |
| /en | Bible study | Psalms 24:1 | 9/10 | minor | Strong, text-anchored exposition: the Hebrew melo, the Levitical land-tenancy background (Lev 25; gleaning), and Paul's use of this verse in 1 Corinthians 10:26 are all accurate, and the short quoted fragments match the WEB wording exactly. The excerpt breaks off mid-sentence ("the systems b"), and verse 2 is paraphrased rather than quoted, though it is not presented as a quotation. |
| /fr | Daily devotional | 1 Rois 17:7 | 9/10 | minor | The quotation matches the Darby text verbatim and the theology (provision can cease without God's abandonment; Cherith leading to Sarepta) is sound and well grounded. Minor issues: the brook is called 'Cherith' while the site's Darby text reads 'Kerith'; 1 Rois 17:6 says the ravens came morning AND evening, not only 'chaque matin'; and the shaded-bushes scenery plus 'ce jour de repos' are added de |
| /id | Daily devotional | Matius 14:30-31 | 6/10 | major ✓ corrected by QC · re-check 10/10 |
The opening retelling of Matius 14:30-31 reads as a condensed paraphrase rather than a verbatim AYT quotation (it merges 'ketika ia mulai tenggelam, ia berteriak' into a single clause), and the devotional contradicts itself: it quotes Jesus acting 'langsung' but then builds a point on 'satu kata: segera', and it closes by calling 'Tuhan, tolong aku' Peter's three words when the text it just quoted |
| /es | Bible study | Acts 21:4 | 9/10 | minor | Strong, text-anchored reflection: the seven days, the cargo unloading (21:3), the 'por Espíritu' wording and the two chains (21:33) are all accurate, and the hard question of whether Paul disobeyed is handled honestly with both views named. Two small weaknesses: within a paragraph about 'Luke's first volume' it credits Peter's 'no vayas' rebuke, which Luke does not actually record (it is in Matthe |
| /ur | Article | خوف اور پریشانی پر بائبل کی تعلیم | 9/10 | minor | Warm, well-grounded pillar page; quotations match the Urdu Geo Version closely, though a few wordings (Phil 4:6 "التماس" vs. the usual "التجا", and the dropped "وہ" in Phil 4:7) should be checked letter-for-letter against the site translation. Contextual claims (Ps 56 and the Philistines at Gath, Timothy's youth, Peter's denial and restoration) are accurate; for a pillar page on anxiety, an explic |
| /en | Daily devotional | Acts 17:27 | 9/10 | minor | Historical and geographical details (the Areopagus rock northwest of the Acropolis, the city's oldest council, Dionysius and Damaris in Acts 17:34) are accurate, and the quotation matches the WEB text exactly. Much of the piece dwells on the surrounding verses and setting rather than verse 27 itself, and the line about 'whoever kept count that day' is a gentle inference rather than something the t |
| /en | Article | The First Letter of Peter - An Overview | 9/10 | minor | Quotations match the WEB verbatim (including the distinctive 'became our father again' in 1 Peter 1:3, correctly flagged as a WEB rendering), and historical claims about Babylon/Rome, Silvanus, Mark and the early-60s date are properly hedged. Minor weakness: the imaginative reconstruction of readers' lives ('stopped pouring libations at the family hearth', the servant girl looking twice) is stated |
| /en | Daily devotional | Genesis 28:16-17 | 9/10 | minor | The opening quotation matches the database text verbatim, and the narrative details (stone pillow, flight from Esau, Luz/Bethel, the stairway and the pillar) are all drawn accurately from Genesis 28. One small imprecision: the words of v16 are said to "give the place its name," whereas the name Bethel comes from v17/19; the cold night air is atmospheric imagination rather than text, though clearly |
Every day an independent AI reviewer — a separate model call, never the one that wrote the content — draws random samples from everything published across all language sites in the past 30 days: in-depth Bible studies, daily devotionals and long-form articles. Each sample is scored 1–10 against Faith.network's published editorial standard on six dimensions: language quality, verbatim Scripture quotation (verified against our own Bible database text), biblical grounding (the content is laid side by side with the passage it explains — every claim must flow from what Scripture itself says), theological soundness, tone & vision, and clarity. Every major or critical finding is corrected the same day: the live content is revised against the standard, re-checked by the reviewer, and the finding is published together with its resolution. Any critical finding or a weak daily average also alerts the editorial team immediately by email. Reports are published unedited — including the misses.
Reviewer model: claude-opus-5 · Editorial standard: published on our Our Approach page · Samples link to the live pages they were drawn from.